Keep KPK!

Keep KPK!

Statement of House Speaker Marzuki Alie directly criticized a number of figures. Discourse dissolution of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and forgiveness programs for corruption judged unconstitutional thinking.
Former Hatorangan Tumpak Panggabean KPK KPK believes should be retained as the most trusted institutions combating corruption in Indonesia
Here's an interview via telephone with Legal, Sunday, July 31, 2011,
What about the dissolution of the KPK discourse?
Yes discourse that I think is inappropriate because it is in its development level of corruption has not been showing declining numbers, the Commission still must be maintained
Regarding now gonjang ganjing among KPK related song Nazaruddin, left alone, it will be examined ethics committee. But it does not mean KPK dissolved. Because even if there is one person made a mistake, what the institution should be dissolved? KPK is not appropriate to be dissolved.
The new Commission could be dissolved if the reason corruption has decreased, the country was free of corruption.

There are also allegations KPK laden political interests?
Nah it is also true KPK laden political interests, there is not so. Only it seems Commission in handling cases unless a bribe, it takes a little longer while people want an instant.
Why work long? because the Commission is bound rules, would raise the case to the inquiry must be really ripe, there are at least two items of evidence. If already at the level of investigation can no longer withdraw or cases in SP3 (Letter of Termination of Investigation Process). Therefore we are aiming for long enough, but if the shot would hit the target.
I do not believe that there are political interests, Marzuki must prove, must not speak of misleading. KPK lot of cracking down on foul play in government and parliament. Head region followed by the KPK that's coming from political parties. So there is no term political interests Commission carried
Then what about the proposed pardon for corruption?
That is not possible unless there is an Act to regulate, if present Enggal can. if you want to change the proposal so there should be new rules.
KPK would not be exhausted to the handling of corruption, the corruption of the old timbulah thought we forgive and we brush with the tax laws. So there is a discourse condone corruption, but it can not be done to remove criminal.
Commission agrees secured through amendments to the 1945?
Act governing the Commission, was enough to secure the Commission, no need to go back into the Constitution. But the Commission should work transparently, so that an external monitor, the public can see the KPK
Should the Commission Supervision Commission?
Commission oversight commission is not necessary. It became a hassle, all created for oversight commission, did not have to be. Oversight of the House and the public have been effective to make the Commission remains on track.
Each statement must be based on the facts alleged do not always guessing. KPK is still needed, despite its ad hoc (temporary) not time be dissolved. I assess the proposed dissolution of the Commission is not appropriate.
(Fer)

From news.okezone.com